Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.
4,875 notes (via dickensian-werewolf & socialismartnature)
121 notes (via glitterlion)
Arundhati Roy (via jahanzebjz)
it’s not about liberating her, but about unclothing her. It becomes an act of humiliation and cultural imperialism.
^^^^^^^^ this.
(via lapalomaazul)
5,173 notes (via dustoffvarnya & jahanzebjz)
I got no time for white jews who don’t realize black people, arabs, muslims, and other “deviants” and poc were murdered during the holocaust. White jews consistently want to use the holocaust to justify their islamophobia and American anti-blackness. White jews need to remember the holocaust is memorable because so many white people were killing other white people. Because when they wipe out the rest of us no one gives a fuck and the history channel never covers it.
thank you! germans carried out genocide against black people BEFORE they killed jews en masse. we were fucking practice.
949 notes (via glitterlion & writeswrongs)
This article exactly summed up why it’s NEVER OK for white women to wear bindi or saree, because Indian & Pakistani women are treated DIFFERENTLY, like OUTCASTS in USA when wearing Indian / Pakistani / Desi clothes. If you whitegirls are so desperate to wear Indian clothes or bindi, you better damn well acknowledge the fact that we do not receive the same treatment as you whitegirls get when we wear our traditional clothes that are part of OUR CULTURE, and not some fucking “trend” that you whitegirls think it’s OK to rip off. Yet you whitegirls are treated as “trendy” and “cool” while ripping off our culture.
This article also mentions an Indian woman’s husband who became embarrased because she wore Indian clothes in public even though they are both Indian!!! Because he wanted her to fit in. THIS IS THE STORY OF OUR LIVES! My mother was asked by my father to stop wearing the bindi, nose ring, and saree because he felt that we were stared at by white people all the time, too much.
This great essay explores both Indian and Pakistani women; Hindu and Muslim women; saree, shalwar kameez, and hijab.
quoted from the article:
Priya moved from India to Virginia in the 1970s, when she was in her twenties, to complete a medical residency. She was surprised to find that the United States had fewer women doctors than India, and that it was much harder for women to occupy positions of power within the medical establishment. Priya had been used to wearing saris in India as professional attire, and she arrived with suitcase full of them. In the American South, she was expected to wear dresses for formal events. She found this rather uncomfortable, because although trousers were common in India, dresses were not. As the only female in her residency program, and as a woman of colour, “I felt so different. I couldn’t find, or even afford Western clothing that was flattering. There are so many losses in migration, and clothes are also a way of holding onto something.” Today, Priya practices at a major teaching hospital in Philadelphia, and wears trousers and blouses under her white coat; she feels that Western garments are essential to establishing a therapeutic alliance with her patients, for whom her Indian clothing would mark her as different, and ultimately, as someone not to be taken seriously as a doctor.
Farzana was also in her twenties when she moved from Pakistan to Philadelphia in the 1990s to pursue medicine. The transition to trousers and scrubs, however, was not so painful for her as it had been for Priya. The thought of wearing a salvar-kameez (the dominant garb in urban Pakistan) in her professional life here “never really occurred” to her, partly because she did not consider it fashionable at the time. Like Priya, Farzana acknowledges the importance of “blending in” as a doctor. That is one reason why she says she doesn’t “believe in the hijab. Why would you want to stand out?” As a Muslim herself, she also questions whether the “modesty” it supposedly signals has any relevance now: “Maybe the hijab was valid fourteen hundred years ago, or maybe even a hundred years ago, but I don’t think it is valid anymore, at least not in the West.” But, on the other hand, she notes that in Philadelphia, “If a woman wore hijab to work at the hospital, patients and colleagues would think: you’re a Muslim, you’re different. There is bigotry in peoples’ minds, though they may not say it.” These remarks remind us that although many African American women in Philadelphia also wear the hijab, for immigrant women this garment (along with others, like the sari) has the potential to call into question their very right to belong.
Perhaps this is why, though Philadelphia is a diverse city, both Priya and Farzana feel that only Western clothes would make them acceptable to their patients. In their social lives their attitudes differ. Priya confesses that she does not “wear Indian clothing that often now. I become too much an object of curiosity. People see you as too exotic.” On the special occasions that she would prefer to wear a sari, she says, “my husband gets embarrassed. He would rather we blend in.” Farzana is more comfortable wearing Pakistani clothing, especially because current salvar-kameez styles are “much more Westernized…very stylish.” These differences speak in part to the fact that the salvar-kameez is a kind of pantsuit but the sari has no Western analogue, and tends to provoke more comment. But they also speak to the different experiences the two women had on arrival. Priya’s memories of standing out make her cautious about ever doing so, whereas Farzana feels that “exotic is good now, you know? I think society has moved on, being different is considered a plus point.”
Srilata has worn saris since she moved to the U.S. from India in the 1970s. She has worked in retail, at Kinko’s, as a taxi cab driver, and, for the past decade, as a university librarian. On days when she knows that she will be stationed at the information desk of the library, Srilata makes sure to wear saris “so that when people walk in they will say ‘oh, there are Indians also working in this library.’” Srilata’s devotion to the sari is also shaped, in her own telling, by her religiosity. She is a devout Hindu who makes pilgrimages to temples across the U.S, and no matter how long the drive, wears saris “out of respect to God….It is my own personal feeling, nobody says there is anything wrong with wearing pants to temple.” Srilata claims she has never been told that she could not wear Indian clothes, and is dismissive of her friends and relatives who feel the pressure to conform. While her sister stopped wearing a bindi because of constant questions and stares, Srilata proudly recalls how she dealt with them. And although her own children do not feel they can wear Indian clothes to work as doctors or lawyers, Srilata insists that in fact second-generation Indian women should have no such qualms: in the United States, “there is no objection” from the “surrounding culture.”
Indian women born and brought up in the United States tell quite a different tale. Sonia and Ratna are both students at Penn who grew up in places where there were not many Indians—Sonia in a suburb of Little Rock, and Ratna in a suburb of New Hampshire. Sonia was “very self conscious about being Indian in a “cloistered affluent white suburb” full of “churchgoing Baptists eager to proselytize.” Both remember their early aversion to public displays of difference: as a child, Sonia was embarrassed if her mother wore saris outside of Indian gatherings or events, and Ratna remembers refusing to pick up an item from the grocery store because she was wearing Indian clothes. It’s the classic immigrant story, Ratna wryly notes. “Now, I have a lot theoretical frameworks to understand it, like the notion of white privilege. But then, the burden was always on me. I never thought about it as external pressure.”
381 notes (via lostintrafficlights & deafmuslimpunx)
Die.
Burn him at the stake
haha I hope anyone who takes Richard Dawkins remotely seriously unfollows me now because he is literally scum
people think this clown is someone to be admired and emulated
This is an absolute joke. You can’t even begin to sensibly list all the ways Muslims have excelled in these areas.
Al-Khawarizmi invented algebra. The word algorithm is derived from his name.
Muslims invented the symbol to express an unknown quantity (x).
An arab muslim wrote the first medical book on smallpox in the whole of recorded history. No one else had ever done any research on this topic.
Muslims pioneered quasicrystaline geometry, a mathematical system of interlocking polygons whose pattern never repeats, gorgeously reflected in the Arabesque tilings of Abdullah Khan Madrasa FIVE WHOLE CENTURIES AGO.
2,688 notes (via kidomega & maggotmaster)
244,005 notes (via midnight-water & dionthesocialist)
[…]The extremely few transracial adoptions of white children to non-white adopters that have taken place in contemporary USA not surprisingly also provoke hostile reactions and suspicions that the children might have been kidnapped and abducted, considering that historically there were laws banning and prohibiting people of colour to even foster white children[…]
Within Europe there is a long and similar tradition of stories about Christian women who had been raped and abducted by non-Christian men such as Muslims and Jews, and even more about Christian children who had been kidnapped and sacrificed for ritual murdering by Jews or Roma people. Such unfounded rumours often led to massacres, pogroms, and persecution.
An echo of this European myth was the false accusation that a white Italian baby had been kidnapped by an Italian Roma group in 2008, and which led to police brutality and pogrom-like attacks against Roma people all over the country[…]
- Tobias Hubinette, Transracial Adoption, White Cosmopolitanism, and the Fantasy of the Global Family
76 notes
p.s. Funny how folks are tossing out allegations of everything from OCD to autism to gross generalizations of mental illness
but somehow no one ever stops to point out that Adam Lanza was a class-privileged able-bodied white male
when it is the latter mass of privileges that have time and time again proved to define a serial killer’s profile, NOT the former spectrum of disability or illness.
>mass of privileges that have time and time again proved to define a serial killer’s profile
i love it when you sallies get into my territory.
First, Adam Lanza is not a serial killer. He’s a school shooter, and if you want to classify him as anything you can call him a mass murderer. Serial killers are people who murder two or more people, with a cooling off period between them, for psychological gratification, money, etc.
Second, the FBI has time and time again declared that there isn’t a set of defined characteristics that may identify a serial killer; there’s been a huge number of black, latino, asian and white serial killers and race has been proved not to have anything to do with serial killing (except for the fact that SKs tend to kill within their race). Serial killers also tend to come from poor, unstable backgrounds, although again, this isn’t the norm and it doesn’t mean that all serial killers are poor or had a difficult childhood. A number of them, however, suffered some sort of childhood abuse or grew up in difficult conditions. As for able-bodied, there have been instances of serial killers who in this time would be considered trans (Ed Gein).
Do your research, please.
Look, I get that you’ve clearly spent countless hours obsessing about murder in an attempt to inject some excitement into your sheltered, pedestrian existence, but your self-image is going to have to take a seat in light of some actually important subject matter for all my new followers (hey cupcakes)
“[Your] territory?” Oh my g-d. I am truly sorry for the crushing mediocrity of your bio spawned existence.
[TRIGGER WARNING] We regret to inform that you are addressing one of the “Chosen” children who, under the auspices of the multi-billion transnational abduction industry, was clinically diagnosed a serial killer before I even cleared puberty.
I didn’t sign up for this shit either, I might add, so hold fast onto your envy.
You regurgitate self-serving limited data sets from a federal government bureau that targeted that nation’s greatest civil rights leaders and peaceful protesters, a government that legalizes AND subsidizes the ritualized torture and murder of “killer” children like me with millions in federal taxes.
I actually survived the aforementioned federally subsidized lethal torture, all the while being likened to murderers like Bundy and Dahmer throughout my childhood and adolescence due to nothing more than your junk science and institutionalized bigotry.
Neither you nor your paltry pathetic followers who style themselves after figures like Dahmer — a white pedophile who preyed upon children of color — possess the slightest clue of how this bullshit is twisted in clinical and political contexts against the most oppressed members of society.
Ah, sweet luxury of ignorance & disbelief for those whose knowledge of such is more attributable to Wikipedia and Hot Topic rather than real, life experience.
Think your privilege apologist ass would be waxing semantic if Adam Lanza didn’t pass the domestic paper bag test? That your precious government-approved seal of mass murder would stick in FIBbie jurisdiction amidst cries of terrorism and honor killings?
Let’s not even get into how FIBbie analysis is wholly absent with respect to other racial groups because it’s so trapped in binary scales sans U.S. prison industrial complex interpolation. Your predictions simply implode upon their own self-contradiction: ‘serial killers also tend to come from poor, unstable backgrounds’ but ‘this isn’t the norm’ etc.
p.s. Trans people cannot be able-bodied? lolwut.
71 notes (via aelur-deactivated20130423 & brandx)
The “gay issue” is becoming an increasingly hot topic in Western media coverage of the Arab world. In fact, beginning with the spate of gay killings in US occupied Iraq, the status of non-normative sexualities has perhaps been enfolded within a discourse that highlights the plight of “women” in Arab/Muslim countries, and the ideological, material, and military mobilization that such a discourse licenses.
This is not to say that homophobia does not exist in the Middle East. It does. It exists in every country in the world. However, the question here is: Are these groups/governments legitimately and honestly concerned about LGBTQs in the Middle East, or are they simply using them and their struggles for their own ends, whether it is to show how much more advanced they are or to deflect attention away from their own homophobia/political problems? Does the Israeli government, for example, honestly want to help Palestinian LGBTQs, or is it simply using them to make a point about Israeli society being more advanced, and to whitewash its occupation? Indeed, if the Israeli government wanted to help Palestinian LGBTQs, wouldn’t removing an occupation be the first step?
Imperialistic states like USA and Israel have not only appropriated women’s rights to instigate more war but they have also invaded and appropriated the space of LGBTQ communities by using their identity as an excuse to wage more war. The phenomenon is called Pinkwashing. Make sure you read about it.
(via mehreenkasana)
379 notes (via dustoffvarnya & mehreenkasana)
Page 1 of 4